SnarestoneIron
4:50 Sun Jan 10
Re: West Ham did not really win the 1966 World Cup
|
Don't be such a twat, it's done tongue in cheek!
If you can compose a song that celebrates us being the 2nd team to win a European trophy, please post it here and maybe we will start singing it!
|
simon.s
4:40 Sun Jan 10
Re: West Ham did not really win the 1966 World Cup
|
We won the World Cup. Deal with it.
|
team boaty
4:23 Sun Jan 10
Re: West Ham did not really win the 1966 World Cup
|
Of course we won it for England but West Ham won the world cup in 1966
Not even up for debate. To state otherwise is simply denying what is common knowledge
|
Johnson
4:12 Sun Jan 10
Re: West Ham did not really win the 1966 World Cup
|
Bleating on about that stadium is more embarrassing for me.
|
cosmo smallpiece
3:34 Sun Jan 10
Re: West Ham did not really win the 1966 World Cup
|
"SECOND EVER CLUB TO WIN A EUROPEAN TROPHY (after Spurs) is the one I punt out "
And you think the World Cup one is embarrassing.
Do one mate.
|
Alwaysaniron
3:19 Sun Jan 10
Re: West Ham did not really win the 1966 World Cup
|
Of course we won it 1985 you Spurs loving prick. Now you admit you're wrong and be let back into the Irons family or continue with your insane rantings and be ostracised forever.
|
One McAvennieeeeee
3:10 Sun Jan 10
Re: West Ham did not really win the 1966 World Cup
|
I absolutely love the fact we won the World Cup, and bring it up at every possible opportunity.
|
11MDE
3:08 Sun Jan 10
Re: West Ham did not really win the 1966 World Cup
|
Yes we did.
|
Full Claret Jacket
2:49 Sun Jan 10
Re: West Ham did not really win the 1966 World Cup
|
Nothing embarrassing about winning the World Cup especially in an era when it was about playing football and not feigning injury, cheating and earning peanuts.
No doubt the heavy West Ham influence both in players contribution and their playing style won the World Cup.
|
1964
2:41 Sun Jan 10
Re: West Ham did not really win the 1966 World Cup
|
Bollocks - I'll say what I like.
West Ham WON the 1966 World Cup
|
Sven Roeder
12:00 Sun Jan 10
Re: West Ham did not really win the 1966 World Cup
|
I understood Greaves injury was a gash on his shin and that he was fit again for the final.
Would have been easy for Ramsey to bring him back and imagine he would have got some stick if England had lost.
And maybe Geoff Hurst would have become an alcoholic
|
:^)
11:52 Sun Jan 10
Re: West Ham did not really win the 1966 World Cup
|
WE KNOW WHAT WE ARE
WE KNOW WHAT WE AAAARRRRRREEEEE
WORLD CUP WINNERS
WE KNOW WHAT WE ARE
|
jack flash
11:47 Sun Jan 10
Re: West Ham did not really win the 1966 World Cup
|
England would never have won the WC in 1966 without the West Ham contingent
West Ham players scored ALL the goals in the semi-final & final
Apart from that, England were superbly captained, inspired & influenced by one of the best players (& captains) in the World at that period of time
|
Dwight Van Mann
11:46 Sun Jan 10
Re: West Ham did not really win the 1966 World Cup
|
I say it because it really does get cunts who support other teams spitting feathers.
I enjoy that.
|
BRANDED
11:44 Sun Jan 10
Re: West Ham did not really win the 1966 World Cup
|
You could say that the Charltons had a role
|
zico
11:41 Sun Jan 10
Re: West Ham did not really win the 1966 World Cup
|
West Ham maybe didn't win the World Cup for England but almost certainly without those players from West Ham England probably wouldn't have won the World Cup!
It's not so much that Moore, Hurst and Peters played but that the goals as someone has already said came straight off the Chadwell Heath training field.
Must say that Martin Tyler documentary earlier this week on the World Cup win was an enjoyable piece of television. I didn't know that Greavsie was pretty badly injured in the third game and probably wasn't fit for the Final anyway. For years I had assumed that Ramsey had a real choice to make between Greaves and Hurst.
|
balders
11:37 Sun Jan 10
Re: West Ham did not really win the 1966 World Cup
|
I've got 3 different style of t shirts saying we did
Biggest plus it fucks off every other club in the country
|
Sven Roeder
11:33 Sun Jan 10
Re: West Ham did not really win the 1966 World Cup
|
Well perhaps that proves the original post.
It still is a remarkable achievement though.
As much as it must grate with fans of General Franco's old team.
|
AKA ERNIE
11:29 Sun Jan 10
Re: West Ham did not really win the 1966 World Cup
|
Sven nope they dont .
|
Sven Roeder
11:27 Sun Jan 10
Re: West Ham did not really win the 1966 World Cup
|
I presume they would regard it as Catalonia having won the World Cup and sing about that.
It is remarkable that every goal in the tournament was scored by players from one club.
|
Sxboy_66
11:23 Sun Jan 10
Re: West Ham did not really win the 1966 World Cup
|
Fucking post '66ers
|
| 
